A couple of weeks ago, New York launched the Great Appliance Swap Out. This program offers $50 to $105 rebates on the purchase of qualified appliances. You may have noticed in various news articles and public service announcements that it was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and administered by an organization that calls itself NYSERDA.
Chances are you probably didn’t concern yourself with NYSERDA. But you should.
First, grab your most recent electrical bill. Scroll down through the delivery services portion of it. You’ll notice something called “SBC.” Depending on how big your household may be, the SBC line item ranges from $2.50 to $5 a month. That’s not chump change. You’re shelling out $30 to $60 per year, money that both you and I know would be best spent by you and not the government.
You see, the SBC is a tax. The acronym means “Systems Benefit Charge.” According to National Grid, these funds “reflect costs associated with mandated public policy programs — low income assistance, energy efficiency programs and certain research and development programs, including the advancement of renewable energy resources.” The recipient of these fees is the aforementioned NYSERDA — New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
If you are an astute student of all things government, the first thing that comes to mind is “why are we paying taxes to a public authority?” Authorities are corporate instruments of the state created by the legislature to further public interests. They are basically private enterprises with a public flair that are legally and administratively autonomous from the state, meaning they are accountable to no one but themselves. They are typically funded by user fees and should never be funded by taxes. Yet, here’s NYSERDA being funded by a tax in your power bill. Combined with the lack of accountability to the taxpayers, that makes the systems benefit charge a classic example of taxation without representation. That’s the same kind of thing that got the colonists all fired up during the American Revolution.
And it’s the same kind of thing that gets me fired up at the office. Long-time readers of this column know how I despise the competitive structure of electricity in New York. My company pays twice what our competitors in Ohio and Indiana pay for power. That’s pretty significant, considering we use as much electricity as two average-sized villages. In my ongoing analysis of what makes my power bill so high, I’ve long had the SBC in my sights. Back in 2007, I was on the warpath over the charge that then amounted to $8,250 annually. That’s a lot of money. But, much to my chagrin, after analyzing 2009’s bills, I made the grim discovery that something changed in collection of these taxes. Last year, for virtually the same amount of electrical consumption, we paid a staggering $32,050 for the SBC, almost four times what we did just three years earlier.
Back when the charge was “only” $8,250, I was intent on putting it in front of Gov. Eliot Spitzer. I was hopeful that the Wall Street Watchdog would have been just as disgusted as I about the unrepresented tax. His director of operations shared my concerns with the Public Service Commission. In her response, PSC Chairwoman Patricia Acampora barely addressed my concerns and instead waxed poetic about what NYSERDA supposedly does, like lowering overall electrical demand and costs for New Yorkers. She also noted that, yes, NYSERDA does collect its fees from electrical users, but the state has oversight over what it does with its monies. Considering how ineffective that “oversight” is with the New York Power Authority, Thruway Authority and 700 other authorities across the state, I could only laugh.
That’s what we’re up against, folks: An entity that shouldn’t be taxing us but is and is allowed to do so at the behest of the state. Whether you’re a family or a business trying to make ends meet in these tough times you should be frustrated with this tax that is — like a few others — hidden in your power bill where you might just never see it.
Please take the time write your elected officials and let them know you’re sick of playing nice with NYSERDA.
Bob Confer is a Gasport resident. His column appears every Monday. Contact him at bobconfer@juno.com.
Bob Confer
CONFER: NYSERDA and your power bill
- Bob Confer
-
-
CONFER: Obama policies promote outsourcing
As a manufacturer, I’ve been interested in President Barack Obama’s insourcing kick.
-
CONFER: Newspapers are a tool for good
Quite often I speak to large groups — like Leadership Niagara or students at SUNY Brockport — about leadership skills.
-
CONFER: Senator Maziarz stands his ground
Quite a few years ago I wrote a column about bringing the Castle Doctrine to New York State.
-
CONFER: It’s time to end the minimum wage
Early in this legislative session, New York senators and assemblypeople debated Sheldon Silver’s proposal to increase the minimum wage in New York by $1.25.
-
CONFER: Deciphering your phone bill
My phone bill is probably not very different from yours.
-
CONFER: Roy-Hart closes book on local control
When property owners in the Royalton-Hartland School District received their school tax bills late last summer, nearly all of them were taken by surprise by a new line item that indicated the district’s (read “taxpayers’ ”) financial support for the Middleport Free Library, forever adopting it as its ward.
-
CONFER: Using the police as tax collectors
America is unique in that most policing is done at the local level by county, city or village officers.
-
CONFER: The ingenuity of the Greatest Generation
Last Sunday marked the birth date of my grandfather Ray Confer, who, along with my father, had founded Confer Plastics.
-
CONFER: Your home is a bad investment
Common sentiment is that real estate — specifically the home — is one of the best investments that a family can make.
-
CONFER: Time to end the NFL’s blackout rule
Long ago, in a much simpler time, ticket sales accounted for the majority of revenues for professional football teams.
- More Bob Confer Headlines
-


