Less is not more. Never. But it might be better.
That’s the question Niagara County voters have to answer for themselves as they pull the lever today on a ballot initiative to reduce the size of the Niagara County Legislature from 19 members to 15.
Proponents say the measure will save the county money by eliminating the salaries of the four legislators — a $60,300 savings per year. Opponents say it will reduce the level of representation for county residents as each legislator will have to look after a larger number of constituents. Each legislator currently serves about 11,000 constituents. If the downsizing goes through, each will have about 14,000 constituents.
I say both arguments are hogwash.
The real savings comes not from the reduction of salaries in the legislature itself, but from the reduction of salaries of friends and loved ones who get themselves plum jobs in government. Instead of 19 people with pet projects trying to find family members and neighbors jobs, there will only be 15 people doing such. The nepotism savings alone could be hundreds of thousands of dollars per year … not to mention the potential savings from having fewer pet projects to worry about.
Meanwhile, the argument that a smaller legislature will be less responsive to residents’ needs makes an assumption that the legislature is responsive to your needs. I’m pretty sure we can agree that’s a flawed argument. I mean, really, how often do you see your legislator? I’m going to guess you see them every other October when they’re on your doorstep telling you what a great job they’ve done, right?
There’s another theory that certain members of the legislature only favor the reduction because they can then reduce the number of seats allocated to Niagara Falls, thereby reducing the Falls’ political power … and the number of Democrats in the legislature.
While I could see the benefit of such a power grab, it seems a bit too conspiracy theory for me and I thereby reject it. That said, I would like to see the districts redrawn by some sort of neutral third party when it’s time for redistricting. I would also like to win the lottery. Odds are probably about the same. And I don’t play the lottery.
Personally, I support the reduction of the legislature and think you should, too. I think the positives of potential savings far outweigh the negatives of unresponsiveness, mainly because I don’t buy the argument to begin with.
I’ll make it easy on you if you’ve yet to cast your vote. If you like to save money, hold up one hand. If you only see your legislator around election time, hold up another hand. If you’ve got both hands in the air, vote yes to downsize. If you’ve only got one hand in the air, vote no. And if you have no hands in the air, you’ve got more money than brains.
•••
A personal side note: This is the first election in about a dozen years where I’m not working as a reporter or commentator on Election Night. I have done so the entire time I’ve been back in Western New York and had also been a reporter my last two years in Ohio.
I’m not sure how this makes me feel, to be honest. It’s weird, that’s for sure.
But I’ll still be participating in the election … by voting. Odds are, actually, that I’ve already voted by the time you read this. If you haven’t voted yet and the polls are still open, please go vote. Men and women have died so you could.
Scott Leffler has been a member of the local media for the past decade, working previously for Greater Niagara Newspapers and WLVL radio in Lockport. He can be reached at scott.leffler@gmail.com.
Columns
LEFFLER: An easy decision, hands down ... or up
- Columns
-
-
HOPKINS: Big mistakes by Romney, Obama
Rick Santorum’s strong showing Tuesday in Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado should come as no surprise.
-
DUVALL: Church shouldn’t be forced to offer birth control
In announcing that the federal government will require religious institutions to provide free access to birth control, President Obama touched off a heated debate about religious freedom — one he is likely to lose.
-
CONFER: Time to end the NFL’s blackout rule
Long ago, in a much simpler time, ticket sales accounted for the majority of revenues for professional football teams.
-
LEFFLER: Don’t wait to be productive
I’ve always been a bit of a night person. It started in college when I would stay up all hours of the night — doing homework. Or something.
-
DUVALL: Immigration, not economy, could tip 2012 election
In a handful of swing states that will decide the election, immigration will play a large — perhaps even determining — role in whether Barack Obama gets another four years.
-
TUCKER: Another side of the SPCA
With all the negative news about the SPCA of Niagara County, it seems a good time to weigh-in about the wonderful SPCA Serving Erie County.
-
ADAMCZYK: The return of The Slash
A recent column in this space about the myriad effects of personal technology (smartphones si, singing toothbrushes no) mentioned the curse of lifelong learning, that carousel of constant vocational training and retraining forced by a life on a globe spinning faster and flattening faster than society can cope, and that’s where the commentators keyed this in this week’s virtual mailbag.
-
Keppeler: Give me shelter
I hate the cold.
Most winter days in the Tonawanda News newsroom, I’m sitting here wearing my coat. (I’m doing it right now, as a matter of fact.) -
DUVALL: To the moon, Newt!
Normally I would jump at the chance to make fun of Newt Gingrich for saying something zany like how he plans to build American colonies on the moon.
-
CONFER: Federal spending derailed by Amtrak
We’ve been inundated with news reports about the fiscal woes of the U.S. Postal Service. Why is it that we never hear anything about another federal enterprise facing ongoing losses -- Amtrak?
- More Columns Headlines
-






