When a New Yorker donates to a candidate’s campaign the assumption is the money pays for the campaign, of course. Not always. Under the state’s cloudy campaign finance laws, those bucks can be used for a wide array of expenses, from paying for automobiles to airline tickets to athletic team sponsorships and even donations to other candidates.
In New York, the loosely structured and enforced campaign finance system allows incumbent legislators wide latitude to write checks for expenses that are marginally related, at best, to campaigning. It’s one more advantage state lawmakers have as they secure a grip on their offices, keep favor with voters and discourage challengers who want to change the status quo.
It’s a handy system for incumbents, but not one conducive to creating the kind of political competition that can force lawmakers out of their Albany comfort zone.
In fact, the system is so weak that in 2007 the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s law school followed up its 2004 condemnation of the Legislature with a highly critical look at the state’s campaign finance laws, called “Paper Thin: The Flimsy Facade of Campaign Finance Laws in New York.” The report points out the liberal campaign contribution limits that allow candidates to fatten accounts that they can then use for expenses that are not related to their campaign.
As an Albany bureau report shows in today’s paper, legislators use the money to pay for cars — Sen. James Alesi from Perinton in suburban Rochester spent about $18,750 in campaign funds on a Cadillac — and to donate to other political causes. Money is power, and when you’ve got enough to spread around, that increases your influence.
It’s not a bad formula for legislators, but for constituents who suffer when their lawmakers get too complacent, it’s not a good deal.
In releasing its 2007 report, the Brennan Center, which had labeled New York’s Legislature as the most dysfunctional in the U.S. five years ago, pulled no punches in its press release. “New York pretends to address the influence of money in politics, but in reality its regulatory system is among the worst in the nation,” read a statement from the center’s executive director.
Most dysfunctional. Worst in the nation. These characterizations should have been a wake-up call to change. To accomplish that, legislators would have to heal themselves and heed recommendations from a number of good-government groups. In the wake of the session-ending Senate debacle, campaign finance becomes one more reform that voters must insist upon from lawmakers in 2010. Otherwise, they’re likely to get a repeat of 2009.
— The Star-Gazette of Elmira
Editorials
Insist on campaign finance reform
- Editorials
-
- Give chicken plan free range
-
Scale back Canal Fest hours
A decision Tuesday by the Tonawanda Common Council to require daily Canal Fest operations on the south side of the canal to conclude by 10 p.m., rather than 11, apparently isn’t sitting well with Canal Fest organizers, who have yet to agree to the change.
-
OUR VIEW: Kudos to Slaughter on STOCK Act
Rep. Louise Slaughter and a small band of colleagues in the House of Representatives deserve praise for their determination in putting a stop to a long-standing dirty secret in politics — that members of Congress have been making a boatload of cash by parlaying their official knowledge of the nation’s affairs into private fortunes on the stock market.
-
OUR VIEW: Time to fundamentally rethink education
In the three school districts primarily composing the Tonawandas we are seeing, in varying degrees, the beginning of the end of education here as we know it.
-
OUR VIEW: Super job by Bills on signing Williams
More than the Xs and Os of a football playbook, the Mario Williams signing is a generation-in-the-waiting signal that this franchise is finally on the right track.
-
OUR VIEW: WNY must build on success at ECC
In reading Sunday’s cover story by reporter Jill Keppeler, readers probably shared our shock in the success story that is the Erie Community College industrial technology program.
-
OUR VIEW: ‘Mailing it in’ is not good enough
The U.S. Postal Service has been mailing it in for years.
-
KEPPELER: Daydream believer
I felt sorry for Whitney Houston. But this week, the world lost two people whose departure makes me truly nostalgic.
-
OUR VIEW: Slisz v. Beyer exposes flaws in election system
Though voters in the city who have waited for nearly four months to find out who won might find this welcome news, the problems with our election system this razor-thin race uncovered are anything but comforting.
-
OUR VIEW: Officials need to take walk
The tumult and excitement over approving Nik Wallenda’s request to walk across the Niagara Gorge has at times been deafening.
- More Editorials Headlines

